MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE Products Liability Claims | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE Products Liability Claims | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE Products Liability Claims, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE Products Liability Claims

12 No. 49 ANINSCLR 4Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report (Approx. 5 pages)

MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE Products Liability Claims

12 No. 49 ANINSCLR 4Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report (Approx. 5 pages)

12 No. 49 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report
October 4, 2002
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

MINN. CT. APP. FINDS PRO RATA ALLOCATION APPROPRIATE IN BREAST IMPLANT CASE

Products Liability Claims

A Minnesota appellate court has upheld trial court's rulings that in underlying breast implant cases, the trigger of coverage is on a continuous basis and allocation of damages is pro rata, based on the carrier's time on the risk. The panel also said...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.