COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP. Strick Corp. v. Strickland | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP. Strick Corp. v. Strickland | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP. Strick Corp. v. Strickland, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP. Strick Corp. v. Strickland

8 No. 6 ANIPLR 9Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP. Strick Corp. v. Strickland

8 No. 6 ANIPLR 9Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

8 No. 6 Andrews Intell. Prop. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
September 18, 2001
Trademarks
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER ‘STRICK.COM’ TRANSFERRED TO STRICK CORP.

Strick Corp. v. Strickland

A trademark owner does not automatically have the right to a domain name that includes its mark, a federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled, allowing a computer consultant to keep the domain name strick.com even though STRICK has been used as a...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.