3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE McCarron v. FDIC | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE McCarron v. FDIC | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE McCarron v. FDIC, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE McCarron v. FDIC

1997 ANCODLLR 21422Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE McCarron v. FDIC

1997 ANCODLLR 21422Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

1997 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 21422
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
June 25, 1997
Severance Benefit
Copyright (c) 1997 Andrews Publications

3RD CIR.: EXEC OWED RETIREMENT BENEFITS, BUT NO SEVERANCE

McCarron v. FDIC

A Thrid Circuit panel has affirmed the judgment of the district court that a bank executive who lost his job when his employer was placed into receivership was not entitled to severance benefits from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. aas receiver. ...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.