SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

13 No. 1 ANPRODLLR 7Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

13 No. 1 ANPRODLLR 7Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

13 No. 1 Andrews Prod. Liab. Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter
March 2002
Automotive (Warranty Dispute):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

SERVICE CONTRACT NOT EXPRESS WARRANTY, CALIF. APP. CT. RULES

Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

A California appeals court, reversing a trial judge's decision, has ruled that a service contract is not an “express warranty” under the state's Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The lower court had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a Dodge...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.