BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS Badie v. Bank of America | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS Badie v. Bank of America | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS Badie v. Bank of America, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS Badie v. Bank of America

4 No. 7 ANBLLLR 3Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS Badie v. Bank of America

4 No. 7 ANBLLLR 3Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

4 No. 7 Andrews' Bank & Lender Liab. Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter
December 2, 1998
Arbitration:
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

BANK OF AMERICA'S ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS INVALID, CA SUPER. CT. SAYS

Badie v. Bank of America

A California appeals court ruled that an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause added to existing credit card account agreements by Bank of America is invalid, saying the change of terms provision did not include resolution of disputes. Badie et...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.