COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY Shipley v. Perlberg | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY Shipley v. Perlberg | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY Shipley v. Perlberg, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY Shipley v. Perlberg

19 No. 12 ANTCLR 4Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY Shipley v. Perlberg

19 No. 12 ANTCLR 4Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

19 No. 12 Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter
October 5, 2001
Lead Poisoning
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

COMPANY OFFICER NOT LIABLE FOR LEAD POISONING ON CORPORATE PROPERTY

Shipley v. Perlberg

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals has ruled that an officer of a corporation that rented property in Baltimore to a resident who later suffered lead poisoning is not liable for damages, because there was no proof that the officer was aware of the...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.