TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT Mathis v. Henderson | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT Mathis v. Henderson | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT Mathis v. Henderson, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT Mathis v. Henderson

15 No. 11 ANEMPLR 8Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT Mathis v. Henderson

15 No. 11 ANEMPLR 8Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 11 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 8
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
April 3, 2001
Sexual Harassment
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

TITLE VII IS EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR HARASSMENT CLAIMS, SAYS EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Mathis v. Henderson

A plaintiff who brought Title VII sexual harassment claims against her employer cannot also bring the same claims against her supervisor individually under state law, the Eighth Circuit has decided, finding that the federal claims preempted the...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.