Singapore High Court considers application to set aside arbitral award based on tribunal's procedural directions | Practical Law

Singapore High Court considers application to set aside arbitral award based on tribunal's procedural directions | Practical Law

In Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2014] SGHC 220, the Singapore High Court considered an application to set aside an arbitral award on the basis that an allegedly agreed arbitral procedure had not been followed. The court also considered when it will use its supervisory powers in relation to procedural orders and directions issued during arbitration proceedings.

Singapore High Court considers application to set aside arbitral award based on tribunal's procedural directions

by Jonathan Leach (Partner), Paul Teo (Partner) and Edward Foyle (Associate), Hogan Lovells
Published on 19 Nov 2014 • Singapore
In Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2014] SGHC 220, the Singapore High Court considered an application to set aside an arbitral award on the basis that an allegedly agreed arbitral procedure had not been followed. The court also considered when it will use its supervisory powers in relation to procedural orders and directions issued during arbitration proceedings.