NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. APP. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I1f07f880660411db8a54a698991202fa/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. APP. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am., Secondary Sources

Skip Page Header

NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. APP. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am.

16 No. 15 ANINSILR 5Andrews Insurance Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

Toggle Menu

NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. APP. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am.

16 No. 15 ANINSILR 5Andrews Insurance Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

16 No. 15 Andrews Ins. Indus. Litig. Rep. 5

Andrews Insurance Industry Litigation Reporter

January 24, 2001

Environmental Claims

NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. APP. RULES

Tosco Corp. v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Am.

The California Court of Appeal has held that a liability carrier cannot be required to defend or indemnify insureds for liabilities arising from property that was not owned during the relevant policy period. The court indicated that coverage for an...

End of Document