‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA

20 No. 8 ANAUTOLR 10Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA

20 No. 8 ANAUTOLR 10Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

20 No. 8 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
January 30, 2001
Seat Belts
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

‘CONTRACTOR'S DEFENSE’ APPLIES IN SEAT BELT CASE, MAINE COURT RULES

Taylor v. Mazda Motor USA

A component subcontractor who follows the specifications of an auto manufacturer in building and testing a seat belt is not responsible for its failure unless the defects are so obvious that a competent contractor would realize the danger, a federal...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.