PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co.

1996 ANCOILR 23328Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co.

1996 ANCOILR 23328Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

1996 Andrews Computer & Online Indus. Litig. Rep. 23328
Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter
December 10, 1996
Personal Injury
Copyright (c) 1996 Andrews Publications

PRODIGY NOT LIABLE FOR EMPLOYEE'S UNPROTECTED SEX WITH CUSTOMER

Haybeck v. Prodigy Services Co.

Prodigy Services Co. cannot be held liable for the actions of an employee who concealed his HIV-positive status from a customer he met through the network and had a sexual relationship with, a New York federal judge has ruled. Haybeck v. Prodigy...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.