FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco

19 No. 8 ANTCLR 3Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco

19 No. 8 ANTCLR 3Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

19 No. 8 Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Toxic Chemicals Litigation Reporter
August 10, 2001
FIFRA
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

FIFRA DOES NOT PREEMPT STATE LAW BUSINESS TORT CLAIM, 9TH CIR. RULES

Nathan Kimmel Inc. v. DowElanco

The Ninth Circuit has reinstated a state law business tort action brought against a pesticide manufacturer that allegedly manipulated its EPA-approved product label to exclude certain makers of protective equipment from the marketplace. The panel...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.