SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

18 No. 23 ANEMPLR 3Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

18 No. 23 ANEMPLR 3Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

18 No. 23 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
*1 June 8, 2004
Discovery
Copyright © 2004 West, a Thomson business.

SMITHKLINE PRESSES FOR DISCOVERY OF ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS

Thomas v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Briefs and Other Related Documents
SmithKline Beecham Corp., accused by a group of employees of misclassifying them as temporary workers to avoid having to pay them benefits, argues in recently filed discovery motions that it should be allowed to serve individualized discovery...
(Defendants' Motion for Leave to Serve Document Requests and Deposition Notices on Absent Class Members), Trial Motion and Memorandum (May 10, 2004)
(Motion for Order Regarding Scope of Discovery), Trial Motion and Memorandum (May 10, 2004)
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.