DUTY TO DEFEND OWED FOR FALSE-IMPRISONMENT CLAIM ARISING FROM FAMILY DISPUTE Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Gutman | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

DUTY TO DEFEND OWED FOR FALSE-IMPRISONMENT CLAIM ARISING FROM FAMILY DISPUTE Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Gutman | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DUTY TO DEFEND OWED FOR FALSE-IMPRISONMENT CLAIM ARISING FROM FAMILY DISPUTE Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Gutman, Secondary Sources
16 No. 19 Andrews Ins. Indus. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Insurance Industry Litigation Reporter
March 21, 2001
Occurrence Issues
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

DUTY TO DEFEND OWED FOR FALSE-IMPRISONMENT CLAIM ARISING FROM FAMILY DISPUTE

Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Gutman

Mutual of Enumclaw had a duty to defend a mother in a claim alleging that she improperly imprisoned her children in an attempt to prevent them from seeing their father, an Oregon appellate court has ruled. The court determined that the insured did...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.