PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE Weisler v. Barrows | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE Weisler v. Barrows | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE Weisler v. Barrows, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE Weisler v. Barrows

21 No. 4 ANDECLR 4Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE Weisler v. Barrows

21 No. 4 ANDECLR 4Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

21 No. 4 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
*1 August 28, 2006
Stock-Options Backdating/Venue
Copyright © 2006 Thomson/West .

PLAINTIFF, COMPANY BATTLE OVER BACKDATING SUIT VENUE

Weisler v. Barrows

The shareholder seeking $33.8 million from officers of telecom equipment supplier Sycamore Networks Inc. for alleged stock-options backdating says he is entitled to litigate in Delaware, but the company says the plaintiff forfeited that option when...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.