NO DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST PARENTS' CLAIMS IN BABY-BOTTLE CASES Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST PARENTS' CLAIMS IN BABY-BOTTLE CASES Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST PARENTS' CLAIMS IN BABY-BOTTLE CASES Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent Am., Secondary Sources
28 No. 15 Westlaw Journal Toxic Torts 5
Westlaw Journal Toxic Torts
*1 September 8, 2010
Insurance (Duty to Defend)
Copyright © 2010 Thomson Reuters .

NO DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST PARENTS' CLAIMS IN BABY-BOTTLE CASES

Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent Am.

A manufacturer of baby bottles and other baby products is not entitled to a defense by its insurers in a series of class-action lawsuits involving the company's use of the chemical bisphenol-A in its products, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.