BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS CP Interests v. California Pools | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS CP Interests v. California Pools | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS CP Interests v. California Pools, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS CP Interests v. California Pools

7 No. 15 ANIPLR 18Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS CP Interests v. California Pools

7 No. 15 ANIPLR 18Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

7 No. 15 Andrews Intell. Prop. Litig. Rep. 18
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
February 16, 2001
Trademark Infringement
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

BUSINESS DISPARAGEMENT DAMAGES TOSSED OUT IN TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN POOL FIRMS

CP Interests v. California Pools

Trying to cover ground that Texas courts have not, the Fifth Circuit has ruled that incurring the expense of attorneys' fees is not, by itself, a sufficient “pecuniary loss” that justifies an award of damages under Texas business disparagementlaw. CP...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.