THIRD CIR. RECOGNIZES POTENTIAL ANTITRUST CLAIM AGAINST CANON Pace Electronics v. Canon Computer Sys. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

THIRD CIR. RECOGNIZES POTENTIAL ANTITRUST CLAIM AGAINST CANON Pace Electronics v. Canon Computer Sys. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, THIRD CIR. RECOGNIZES POTENTIAL ANTITRUST CLAIM AGAINST CANON Pace Electronics v. Canon Computer Sys., Secondary Sources
8 No. 1 Andrews Antitrust Litig. Rep. 13
Andrews Antitrust Litigation Reporter
July 2000
Price-Fixing
Copyright (c) 2000 Andrews Publications

THIRD CIR. RECOGNIZES POTENTIAL ANTITRUST CLAIM AGAINST CANON

Pace Electronics v. Canon Computer Sys.

The Third Circuit has held that Canon Computer Systems' termination of dealer Pace Electronics Inc. may give rise to an antitrust injury resulting from a vertical minimum price-fixing agreement. The appellate court accordingly reversed a ruling...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.