NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR. Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR. Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR. Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR. Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

17 No. 1 ANCODLLR 7Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR. Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

17 No. 1 ANCODLLR 7Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

17 No. 1 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
September 24, 2001
Settlement Issues (Attorneys' Fees)
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

NO FEES FOR DERIVATIVE SUIT THAT DID NOT BENEFIT COMPANY, SAYS 3D CIR.

Zucker v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

Shareholder plaintiff attorneys who brought a derivative suit that did not confer any benefit on the defendant company did not deserve a fee award when that action was dropped as part of a settlement, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia has...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.