NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp.

1997 ANCODLLR 21346Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp.

1997 ANCODLLR 21346Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

1997 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 21346
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
June 11, 1997
Anti-Takeover Defense
Copyright (c) 1997 Andrews Publications

NO REASON TO ENJOIN MERGER VOTE BEFORE MEETING; RULING ENDS TAKEOVER WAR

Ahmanson v. Great Western Financial Corp.

Isquith v. Great Western Financial Corp.

H.F. Ahmanson & Co. ended its hostile bid for Great Western Financial Corp. after a Delaware state court judge refused to delay a GWF shareholder vote to approve a merger with white knight Washington Mutual Corp. H.F. Ahmanson & Co. v. Great Western...