MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co.

1997 ANAUTOLR 24680Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co.

1997 ANAUTOLR 24680Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

1997 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 24680
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
February 4, 1997
Restraint System
Copyright (c) 1997 Andrews Publications

MN APPEALS COURT FINDS SAFETY ACT PREEMPTION OF NO-LAP-BELT SUIT

Schlotz v. Hyundai Motor Co.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that the federal Safety Act preempts a crashworthiness suit based on a manufacturer's failure to provide lap belts. The panel also said that the state's seat belt “gag law” precludes crashworthiness claims. ...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.